The Foozie

September 19, 2009

When I look at the Foozie, I see initial genius. I'm all about efficiency and productivity, especially when you can visibly show your team appreciation all the while maintaining a constant chilled core temperature for your beverage. This can create a pleasant and refreshing sensation. It is a win win situation. However, after thorough investigation and analysis, I would strongly recommend against the foozie. It exemplifies poor engineering design with practicality as a misnomer. Case in point, there will be a lot of gyration and sudden movement caused by the user when one is uncontrollably excited showing their appreciation, therein moving the foamy device with little control. This can generate a huge amount of centrifugal force causing the fluid to consequently spill wildly out of its container and all over the Foozie and perhaps innocent bystanders.

I do not know which board of accreditation that had stamped this product with a "Tailgate Approved" approval but based on this product this board should be viewed with little to no credibility. They're probably inebriated. At this time Phu Pham do not recommend the Foozie, and based on this product, I would stand to be skeptical against the Grooler as well, as theoretically it may sound like a good idea. However, the redirection of thermal energy and channeling it to effectively heat edible food at the consumer level seems perhaps commercially unfeasible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53qofZ_mi-s

and I hate BUD LIGHT.
COORS LIGHT FTW.